Chevrolet Camaro Ss 1969 Vs Ford Mustang

Mustang Bullitt vs.

Chevrolet camaro ss 1969 vs ford mustang. 22 Strong brakes and great steering are further Supra attributes though on a wet track it has a tendency to abruptly fall into oversteer particularly if you trail the brakes on corner entry. The Mustang GT convertible has a 30000 best offer and five. The current high bid is 12000.

In this case the 1969 Mach 1 Mustang and the 1969 Z28 Camaro have been in a lovehate relationship since the late 1960s. Winsor all the way to a beefy 70L CJSCJ V8. Challenger RT Scat Pack.

The high-end SS models come in at 19 MPG and the ZL1 race car offers 16 MPG. Essentially the Camaro matches the Mustang when it comes to fuel economy except for the ZL1 whose performance outclasses any Mustang offers. A V-8 is one thing but style handling and panache can be worth the extra cost.

If you were to simply compare engines the winner would be hard to tell. The Camaro is a Holden Commodore VEVF sedan wearing a coupe costume which makes it a little longer and a smidge heavier than the Mustang. Ford Mustang vs Chevrolet SS Compare price expertuser reviews mpg engines safety cargo capacity and other specs at a glance.

The initial race at 045 confronts a white third-generation CTS-V against a black Chevy Camaro and we get eased into the coming battles with a 1089s Caddy win against the GM siblings 1113s. The Mustangs body stretches 4789mm long but it rides on a short 2720mm wheelbase. Their racecourse test saw the Chevrolet Camaro SS Coupe get clocked a full 33 seconds faster than the Ford Mustang GT Premium Fastback 8067 to 8397 seconds.

But the Camaro has better torque with 455 lb-ft pressing tangentially on its crank. Select a car to compare. For the Camaro the baseline LS Coupe kicks in 23 MPG.